Sri Lanka Equity Forum
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka Equity Forum would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.

Thank You
Sri Lanka Equity Forum

Discussion Forum for Stock Market Investors in Sri Lanka

සිංහල පරිවර්තනය
Submit Post
Submit Post

Latest topics

» Building a business
by Zen1 Today at 4:55 pm

by samaritan Today at 3:06 pm

by samaritan Today at 2:49 pm

» Mahinda:Govt task is to manage Crises & not complain Trump strengthen US Economy
by DS Wijesinghe Today at 1:49 pm

» Ranil: It is natural for foreign investors to pull their money from SL and invest in US
by ruwan326 Today at 12:16 pm

by DS Wijesinghe Today at 10:36 am

by ruwan326 Today at 10:00 am

» ඇඹිලිපිටිය කඩදාසි කම්හල යළි අරඹන්න කොරියන් ස්පා රු. මිලියන 1,200 ක් ආයෝජනය කරයි
by ruwan326 Today at 8:44 am

» Bathbala Balaya...
by DS Wijesinghe Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:26 pm

» Are you happy now? ඔබට සතුටුයිද දැන් ?
by DS Wijesinghe Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:54 pm

» Central Bank will intervene if rupee moves on speculation – official
by Miss-Sangeetha Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:09 pm

by DS Wijesinghe Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:08 am

by ruwan326 Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:02 pm

» රජයට කෘත්‍රිමව රුපියල පාලනය කළ හැකිද?
by samaritan Sat Sep 22, 2018 2:50 pm

» Maharaja from Rajasthan
by ruwan326 Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:29 am

» Weekly Stock Market Roundup
by Insights Equity Fri Sep 21, 2018 10:40 pm

by DS Wijesinghe Fri Sep 21, 2018 10:17 pm

» Summary of Key Announcements during the week 10 August 2018
by ruwan326 Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:32 pm

» Daily Foreign Transactions
by ruwan326 Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:30 pm

» Daily Stock Market Update
by Insights Equity Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:11 pm

» ඩොලරය රු. 170 යි
by samaritan Fri Sep 21, 2018 3:44 pm

by Chanuque Fri Sep 21, 2018 6:24 am

» Time has come to reverse 70 years history
by ruwan326 Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:22 pm

» Gold climbs as dollar weakens on U.S.-China trade dispute
by Miss-Sangeetha Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:39 pm

» BLI Shares
by EGG Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:03 pm

» Banking shares Value picks for long term
by jayathu Thu Sep 20, 2018 1:32 pm

» UAL - Going down now?
by ruwan326 Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:47 pm

» Quality Management Systems
by lenny123 Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:54 am

by Ahcha Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:43 am

» Clarification on the Erroneous Report regarding Sri Lanka issued by Nomura Holdings Inc.
by ruwan326 Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:59 am

You are not connected. Please login or register

Sri Lanka Equity Forum » Stock Market News » Beverly Street restrained from selling counterfeit A&F clothing

Beverly Street restrained from selling counterfeit A&F clothing

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]


Global Moderator
The Colombo High Court issued interim order restraining the D. K. N. International (Pvt) Ltd which is the owner of a chain of Beverly Street retail shops from selling purported counterfeit clothing with the famous American lifestyle trademarks of a Swiss firm.

High Judge M. Samayawardena also issued notice returnable for December 12 on the Defendant D. K. N. International.

The Plaintiff Abercrombie and Fitch Europe SA of Switzerland initiated legal action under Intellectual Property Act against the Defendant for the alleged selling of counterfeit merchandise with trademarks/logos/device belonging to A&F for which Abercombie and Fitch has the exclusive rights.
Nihal Fernando with Ruchira Anthony instructed by Sudath Perera Associates appeared for the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff states the Defendant is engaged inter alia in the retail business of selling clothes, footwear, headgear and cosmetics and the owner of the retail shop Beverly Street which sells clothes, footwear, headgear and cosmetics.

Plaintiff further states the Abercrombie & Fitch came into existence in 1892 as a partnership between David Abercrombie and Ezra Fitch and for many decades was mainly an elite excursion goods retailer that outfitted wealthy businessmen for their outdoor pursuits.

It continued to expand its business of designing, manufacturing, merchandising, promoting, marketing and retailing its high quality men’s, women’s and kids clothing, footwear, headgear, sporting equipment and personal care products, it said.

Plaintiff states the name Abercrombie & Fitch which has been in use since 1892 is owned by it which also owns the Trademarks “Abercrombie & Fitch”, Abercrombie”, “A&F” and the device of a moose.
It claims the Abercrombie & Fitch is known today throughout the world for its high quality collegiate inspired casual all American lifestyle brand of clothing and is one of the world leaders in the manufacture of high quality goods.

The trademarks ‘Abercrombie & Fitch’, ‘Abercrombie’, ‘A&F’ and the devise of the moose are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the name of A & F Trademark Inc. and which trademarks are valid, subsisting and in full force and effect, it maintains.

The trademarks ‘Abercrombie & Fitch’, ‘Abercrombie’, ‘A&F’ and the devise of the moose are registered in its name in more than 10 countries throughout the world including United Kingdom, Japan, Denmark, France, Germany, Spain and Sweden, it claims.

The Plaintiff states that consequent to A & F Trademark Inc applying in Sri Lanka for the registration of trade mark Nos.80003, 70142, 70143, 96591, 96592, 96593, 96595 and 96596, the said trade marks were duly registered in the name of the A & F Trademark Inc and as such A & F Trademark Inc was the registered owner in Sri Lanka of the said trademarks.

Plaintiff contends that in the aforesaid circumstances, it is the proprietor and/or the registered owner in Sri Lanka of the following trademarks which are registered in the name of the Plaintiff under class 25 for clothing, footwear and headgear and under class 42 for retail clothing and personal care product store services, mail order catalogue services featuring clothing and personal care products and accessories thereof and under class 03 for bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions and dentifrices.

The Plaintiff states no entity or person in Sri Lanka or anywhere else in the world is entitled to use the aforesaid trademarks and service marks of the Plaintiff for any purpose whatsoever except with the express consent or authority of Abercrombie & Fitch and/or the Plaintiff.

Abercrombie & Fitch and/or the Plaintiff has authorised a few companies operating garment factories in Sri Lanka to apply and/or affix the aforesaid trademarks of the Plaintiff on its behalf for the limited purpose of fulfilling the orders or instructions placed by Abercrombie & Fitch to the said companies for merchandise, components and services, it added.

The apparels so manufactured on the instructions of Abercrombie & Fitch are only for export and not for wholesale or retail trade in Sri Lanka, it maintains.

From the year 2000 over 10 million units have been manufactured by Abercrombie and Fitch in Sri Lanka, it states.

It further states that Abercrombie & Fitch stringently controls the channels of distribution of Abercrombie & Fitch goods and that all goods including apparel manufactured all over the world under the authority of Abercrombie & Fitch is sent to its final destinations in New Albany, Ohio in the United States of America, Hong Kong and Netherlands for distribution. All internet orders are shipped only from Abercrombie & Fitch offices in New Albany, Ohio.

The Plaintiff states that the Defendant is not authorised to offer for sale, sell and/or stock for sale Abercrombie & Fitch goods.

By the Defendant purchasing goods not emanating from Abercrombie & Fitch and offering for sale and/or selling and/or stocking for sale such goods on which marks identical and/or misleadingly resembling and/or confusingly similar to the Plaintiff’s trademarks have been affixed, Defendant is aware and cannot be unaware that the public and the trade would likely to be misled and/or deceived into believing that such goods are the goods of Abercrombie & Fitch, it complains.

The Plaintiff is seeking a permanent injunction from the Court restraining the Defendant from directly and/or indirectly, continuing to use and/or offer for sale and/or sell and/or stock for sale and/or distribute and/or advertise and/or market and/or promote and/or import into and/or export out of Sri Lanka and/or otherwise deal with goods bearing the said trademarks and/or any mark identical and/or misleadingly resembling and/or confusingly similar to the trademarks and/or service marks of the Plaintiff.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum